Defining toughness in college hoops Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Defining toughness in college hoops - Essay ensampleIt is evident from the study that Jay Bilas, the motive of the article Defining toughness in college hoops clarified that his passkey perception of toughness was physical and based on how much punishment I could dish give away and how much I could take. Therefore, by using explicit description of what toughness was not inescapably what it obviously means, the author started establishing his arguments using narration, description, and comparison. For example, the guidelines expounded on setting a good screen, the author defined what it takes for hoops walkawayers to manifest the necessary actions in terms of improving the chances for a teammate to get openand greatly improving your chances of getting open. A good screen can force the defense to make a mistake. In contrast, setting a bad screen was not in effect(p)ly described. The only translation provided was that a lazy or bad screen is a waste of everyones time and energy. The interpretation is lacking and insufficient to clearly differentiate disparity with an effective strategy. In addition, as readers get to value the guidelines, it was apparent that the author did not provide an effective structure or logical format of presentation. In this regard, there is failure to use logical reasoning. The guidelines, though effective in the entirety, could have been presented in a more logical structure that categorizes the topics in sub-headings. For example, the author explained set a good screen and another(prenominal) topic as dont get screened. These topics could actually be lumped together under techniques for effective screening. ... Another example is the authors discussion on jump to the ball (Bilas 2) and play the ball, see your man (Bilas 3) which could again be discussed in one sub-heading that could be entitled tough shipway of handling the ball. The guidelines were apparently written in no particular order and could have been presented depen ding on the ideas that came to the authors mind. It could be rationalized though that since the author knew that the article was specifically written with basketball enthusiasts, curiously players, as the audience of his discourse, the style, format or structure would not be examined and critiqued to diminish the veracity of the contents. However, considering that the author was duly established as a renowned basketball analyst, his credibility in providing the information was in truth validated. Further, as indicated from the discourse, his personal experiences playing in the ACC, for USA Basketball, in NBA training camps, and as a headmaster basketball player in Europe (Bilas 1) has proven that he was acquired vast authority in to electrical relay competency in the topic. The ability to conform to ethos due to his reputable background made his contentions and arguments valid. Finally, the articles ability to more the audience through eliciting emotional appeal could be viewed a s effective. The main get to validate the authors success was his narrative discourse attesting that when he initially wrote a inadequate blog on the topic, the response was overwhelming. Dozens of college basketball coaches called to tell me that they had put the article up in the locker room, put it in each players locker, or had gone over it in detail with